VIP 3 and 4: Why doesn't Dresden bank and HVB follow the example of the Commerzbank?

Logo of the BSZ® registered association. (openPR) - the regional executive committee of the Commerzbank AG explained with letters from 7 February 2007, which the BSZ® registered association Anlegerschutzkanzlei Dr. Steinhübel is present & from Buttlar, on „all investor inside and to investors into the VIP medium fund 3 and 4 “that the bank did without „with effect for the investors “up to 31.12.2007 the objection of the Verjährung in connection with requirements from the switching of participation of the funds. Thus the bank makes a reasonable contribution for the avoidance of further processes in the current procedure stage.

The Dresdens bank and the HypoVereinsbank should follow this example. The two banks, which supply a central component of the guarantee funds, i.e. the debt assumptions, could not themselves struggle through so far yet to a general renouncementrenouncement renouncement. This leads according to estimate of attorney and BSZ® registered association confidence lawyer von Buttlar to the fact that many investors are forced alone to the inhibition of the Verjährung to submit complaint and produce thus costs, which can be completely easily avoided by a long-term renouncementrenouncement renouncement of the two banks.

Meanwhile the new VIP management tries to win the confidence of the investors again back, by promising all kinds of its opinion after success of promising measures to the Linderung of the unfavorable consequences, which are caused by the change of the tax assessments. On the announced company meetings to 22. and to 29. March 2007 the responsible persons opportunity to explain, why they are so optimistic, the reproaches of the public prosecutor's office and the fiscal authorities to weaken will have been able. The Kanzlei Dr. Steinhübel & of Buttlar, which cares for about 100 investors, guesses all limited partners concerned to visit these meetings in order to make itself its own picture from the current situation to.

Attorney von Buttlar means to the present situation: „Many investors are simply disconcerted. Depending on, with whom they speak, this case is either a financial scandal of tremendous extent or it is so far a law scandal been not yet there. Fact is anyhow that the concerning must pay only once money back in considerable height to the tax office. And thus was not to be counted after the original advertisement for the funds. “

Concerned ones can follow the BSZ® registered association investor protective association „VIP ". The admission into the BSZ® investor protective association costs uniquely 75.00 euro. This amount covers the handling charges of the BSZ® registered association. The further membership in the investor protective association is noncontributory. The requirement examination of the case by the attorneys does not release separate costs.

BSZ® federation for social and civilian right consciousness registered association.
Large room he STR. 36 A, 64807 the castle
Telephone: 06071-823780

Internet: www.fachanwalt-hotline.de
More directly left to the form for announcing for a BSZ® investor protective association:
www.fachanwalt-hotline.de/component/option,com_artforms/formid,4/Itemid,106

BSZ® federation for social and civilian right consciousness registered association.
Large room he STR. 36 A, 64807 the castle
Telephone: 06071-823780
Partner. Refuge Roosen

Internet: www.fachanwalt-hotline.de

For the concerning of distressed investments frequently the question arises, how they are to behave, if the plant problems raises or stands before the total loss. To whom are they to turn Are they to throw to the bad still good money afterwards In this situation important arguments for the entry to a BSZ® investor protective association speak.

It showed itself in the past years that circumstances become in connection with distressed investments ever more complex and more complicated. For the decision over the concrete procedure it is therefore helpfully, as much as possible provable information for example over internal procedures with the investment trust to have over possible misdemeanours of the responsible persons or over the economic efficiency of any requirement opponents. Straight if many investors to a community unite, let themselves from this circle numerous useful information be collected. The BSZ® community of interests is for this approach place and forum.

With the provision of information alone it is however not yet done. For an expert support each individual case must be legally evaluated. Specialized attorneys procure this on the investment right.

The BSZ® registered association co-operates with Kanzleien, that belong to market watchers in this range in the opinion of to the best ones in Germany.

The lawyers have experiences of many years within all ranges of the investment right; they proved their abilities in addition by a multiplicity of upper or of the supreme court to judgements and by hundreds of comparisons for their mandators. The BSZ® registered association obtain the contact to those lawyers, who care for the community of interests concerned.

For the unique entry fee at a value of € 75.00 to a BSZ® investor protective association gives it the following achievements:

A anwaltliche Erstberatung, which points out,

• whether requirements exist,
• against which persons, enterprises and institutions these requirements are directed,
• the chances of success are as large and
• the risk of costs prosecution out of court or of a judicial is as high.
• For legal protection-insured investors a covering inquiry with the insurance


The BSZ® registered association does not co-operate with persons or enterprises, who develop, initiate or obtain investments. Therefore the support is comprehensive and not in any way reduced in the context of the investor protective associations.

The executive committee of the BSZ® registered association is independent and not instruction. Therefore it is free in the decision, which lawyer or which Kanzlei cares for an investor protective association.



Dieser Artikel wurde veröffentlicht auf
OpenPR - http://openpr.de/news/119719/VIP-3-und-4-Warum-folgen-Dresdner-Bank-und-HVB-nicht-dem-Beispiel-der-Commerzbank.html




Google